![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||
BEST PRACTICE IN SHIFTING CULTIVATIONCritical elements of the environment, Solomon IslandsThe Solomon Islands is located in the Western Pacific Ocean in the heart of the Pacific region known as Melanesia. The region encompasses the relatively new nations of Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, New Caledonia and Fiji. Topography and climateThe main islands:
The Solomon Islands:
On these two environments - forest and sea - depend the food security and livelihood of most of the Solomons population. Population, land, cultureEighty percent of the islands 450,000 people live in small isolated communities on their customary or tribal lands:
There are over 87 language groups in the Solomons. Some islands, such as Malaita, have a relatively high population density while others, such as Choiseul, are very sparsely populated. European influence on this ancient culture has been relatively recent. A British Protectorate was established in the early part of this century. Missionary influence began about 100 years ago and most of the population is now Christian and is divided among various denominations. EconomyThe formal cash economy is based on export of copra, cocoa and timber. Tuna fishing licences and, more recently, mining have become important. The cash economy is supplemented by a non-formal economy that provides the food and livelihood for most of the population. Barter and gifts remain an important part of the culture within this informal economy and the sharing of food is an important feature of the wantok traditional social security system. AgricultureTraditional agriculture is based on the shifting cultivation system. Long forest fallows were the traditional norm (15-25 years fallow) and are still practiced in some areas. Population growth (3.6% per annum), land degradation and occupation of land for cash crops have led to declining fallow periods. In many areas shifting cultivation is now under a system of bush fallow with fallow periods of between 5-7 years. In the highest population pressure areas fallow periods have been reduced to critical levels of from six months to three years with as yet no additional practices to maintain soil fertility. In these areas yields are declining along with spoil degradation and biodiversity. The main staples are all roots crops - yam, taro, sweet potato and cassava along with some plantains. Other important crops include slippery kabis, beans and vegetables, sugarcane, bananas; corn and various wild or semi-cultivated crops. Farmer led extension in tribal communities to explore and improve soil fertility and pest management in shifting gardens Many extension programs fail to focus on real needs of farmers or are inaccessible to the farmers. This is especially true in the case of shifting cultivation farmers in Melanesia - the majority of whom are women. Traditional government extension programs have used male extension officers who focus almost exclusively on cash crops such as coconut and cocoa. Innovative extension approaches are needed to work with village farmers (the majority of whom are women) who often have little formal education (literacy is less than 40% in most areas) and have worldviews that need to be understood and built upon for extension programs to succeed. Community ethnobotany...involving the documentation and devitalisation in use of forest food plants harvested from shifting cultivation forest fallows.In areas where shifting cultivation is practiced, a wide variety of products is harvested from the forests. These include foods, medicines, building materials, fibres, fuel and fodder. In the Solomons, it is estimated that most communities utilise more than 400 species of plants from the forest. Forest food plants are believed to provide an important source of food - especially in times of crop failure or shortage and in certain seasons. The management of shifting cultivation fallows has a direct effect on what types of plant and animal products can be harvested from the fallow vegetation. Changes in fallow periods and management appear to be affecting these wild food resources. In Babatana (Choiseul Province), a community based ethnobotanical project was initiated to investigate community knowledge of forest food plants and to revive their use to promote sustainable forest management. Documentation of traditional slash and mulch systems as opposed to more widely practiced slash and burn systems In the Solomon Islands most farmers currently practice slash and burn systems of shifting cultivation where most organic matter is burnt after clearing. Typically, this involves the slashing of bush or secondary forest, leaving it to dry and then setting fire to it. Many farmers perceive that this has always been the practice and that it is their kastom or traditional way of preparing the garden site for planting. It appears that as fallows have shortened in recent decades, farmers have resorted to using fire more intensively than in the past. Our experience suggests the reverse practice would be better - less fire with shorter fallows and more incorporation of organic matter into the soil to preserve soil fertility. Further investigation - by field staff talking with old people and visiting different parts of the country - looking at traditional methods has revealed a more diverse approach to the use of fire. A number of locally specific methods involving the use of organic matter were documented. Some of these methods are still commonly practiced while others are close to disappearing. These traditional methods have been used as an entry point to discuss the role of organic matter in soil fertility with farmers. The aim is to build on farmers traditional understanding of the role of organic matter in their farming systems. Guadalcanal slash and mulchBelow are two systems practiced on the island of Guadalcanal in some bush or inland areas. Yam and Pana slash and mulchGuadalcanal is well known for a system of planting of yams without the use of fire or staking. In most other parts of the Solomons yam gardens are cleared with fire and then the yams are staked with staking material cut from the fallow vegetation. Traditionally, yams are considered to need a long fallow before they will yield well, so yam gardens are usually cleared in forest rather than bush or shrub fallows. The process:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Tasimate slash and mulch gardensThis is a method similar to the yam planting described above and is found in the Tasimate area of Guadalcanal. The difference is that this method of slash and mulch is applied to all food crops, especially sweet potato and taro. This makes the results likely to be more widely applicable. The process:
The system is much higher yielding than slash and burn system practiced in the same area on the same soil types. It also appears to yield very well in relatively short fallows - indeed these short fallow areas are preferred by farmers who practice this method. Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Lau partial burn systemsIn the Lau area of the island of Malaita farmers report that they do not have enough organic matter for a good burn. This is due to shortening of fallow periods as a result of very high population pressure:
This has often led farmers to import more organic matter (usually coconut leaves) for burning on the gardens, a laborious process but one that they consider worthwhile in order to achieve a good burn across the whole garden site. With short fallows of fewer than two years, this is leading to rapid soil degradation. In the near future much of this land may turn into grassland, as has happened in some other parts of the Solomon Islands. In this same area, however, there are traditional practices in current use or that have been used in the past that show that the uniform burning of all slashed fallow vegetation was not always the traditional way. Edu gardensEdu (Alocasia sp) is an important crop in this area. It is usually planted on stoney soils that would not be productive for other root crops. Edu grows well here because the tuber develops on top of the ground. Such sites are reserved for edu cultivation. Edu has high cultural value and is traditionally used as part of bride payment and for the purchase of traditional shell money that is used in cultural payments. The edu planting:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Tuku and biruThese are traditional compost heaps in the bush gardens. This is a traditional practice that is disappearing in some areas in favour of burning all the organic material. ConclusionTraditional knowledge has an important role in reinforcing sustainable management systems. It also provided important links in the move from the known to the unknown and in the trialing and development of new methods to cope with changing land use pressures. We cannot assume that traditional is a fixed group of methods. Traditions are in a constant state of change, sometimes very slow and sometimes very rapid. In many instances local people may not immediately recognise the changes that have occurred in their farming system and stick to methods as their custom. Participatory approaches can be used to discuss change and tradition and help farmers understand the positive and negative consequences of current and past practices for sustainable food production. StrategiesAppropriate strategies with a focus on women as the main agriculturalists have been developed for participatory assessment to plan extension and training in Melanesian communities. The collection of baseline data is often difficult for community based NGOs due to number of different factors such as:
This can result in some NGO projects not b3ing targeted or having poorly developed means of monitoring impact. Participatory approaches can be used for problem identification and the collection of baseline data. This process can also be used to facilitate sharing and understand of the complex resource management issues involved with shifting cultivation and village food security. In this way, the process of problem identification and collecting baseline information is turned into a useful learning device for all project stakeholders or in agriculture development in the target area. In Lauru, Choiseul Province, an APACE pilot participatory food security assessment included the following steps...Selection of communities As not all communities participating in the project could take part. The local management committee developed the selection and criteria with representatives from each of the participating communities. Selection of village facilitators by the community Village facilitators, both women and men, were chosen from each of the two pilot communities. They were people with skills and interest to carry out the task and who had respect within the community. A number of village leaders were involved to ensure the ownership by the leadership of the results of the participatory assessment. Training of village facilitators (3 day workshop) A three-day workshop was held where facilitators learned how to use each of a number of PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal) tools that had been developed to collect the data. The facilitators learned how to be a good facilitator and not impose their ideas, and how to record and compile the data from the community. Community food security assessment (4 days) This was carried out in each village over four days in a program agreed with the community leaders.. Different groups from the village were involved at different times. Tools such as cropping calendar, womens and childrens line etc were carried out in the village while the garden transects and surveys were carried out in small groups in the bush. Compilation of data The village facilitators grouped the data. The NGO staff, with a couple of village experts, compiled the data into a report. This involved grouping the data in various domains and then sorting it into relevant chapters. Each chapter came to some conclusions about resources and threats for food security. Reporting back to the community The same community faciltiators planned a series of dramas to portray the main issues identified in the assessment to the community. A process of discussion in local language was then facilitated. Copies of the report in local language and English were left with the community leaders and all the other groups and organisations that had been involved in the assessment. Production of reports Production of reports was initially to be done by the NGO staff, however the community faciltiators asked to be taught the skills so they could produce the reports themselves. This was a time consuming process but the resulting report was more appropriate to the community. Action planning Outcomes of the assessment:
Advantages
Disadvantages
Transition to fixed site gardening in Avaipa district BougainvilleBougainville is located in the North Solomons province of Papua New Guinea. The island has been subject to a ten year civil war that:
People rely on shifting cultivation to produce their food in much the same pattern as is found in nearby Solomon Islands. The only difference is that a large proportion of Bougainvilles population lives in inland villages where they have little or no access to the marine products that are the major protein source in coastal villages. Amidst the conflict, a community-training centre called Paruparu Education and Development Centre (PEDC) initiated a process of agriculture extension and primary health care education. Over the years of the conflict they managed to improve health standards at the same time that they worsened in many other places on the island. PEDC staff, as volunteers, developed an innovative clan-based extension approach as well as a package of simple technologies to improve food production and food security. Clan based extensionThe clan-based extension model was developed as an alternative to the traditional models of agriculture extension that had been used in Bougainville. These involved agriculture extension officers (known as didimen) posted to a particular area for a period of time. This system has proved ineffective for a number of reasons that are beyond the scope of this article. Clan mareeba management committeeThe clan-based extension system starts with the establishment of clan-based resource management committee. The committee is formed after an awareness-raising and educational process facilitated by visiting PEDC resource people. From the clan, different members are selected to represent different resources important to the community such as water, forests, gardens and food production. The committee should make decisions for that clan and their land in order to sustainably manage their resources for the benefit of all clan members. Training of community-based rural extension officersThe clan mareeba management committee then selects a person to be trained by the training centre in various agricultural methods and technologies. This person attends the PEDC training centre on a part-time basis for two years. During this time she or he lives with other farmers and learns from their experiences in:
Over the two years they spend increasing periods of time in their home communities where they start to apply what they have learned. Once they are competent with the new methods, the clan management committee selects members of the clan to specialise in different areas. For example, one person might concentrate on poultry, another on fish farming, another on tree planting and perhaps all of them on fixed-site gardening. In Melanesian society the clan is the natural unit of cooperation where disputes are least likely to occur. The clan based extension officers are working for the benefit of their own people who they know and with whom they share deep trust. Simple, useful technology proves successfulThe PEDC agriculture extension model involved the use of simple technology to increase farmers yields as the first step in attracting their interest in the potential of improving the production in their shifting cultivation fields. This technology was a simple method of raised beds for sweet potato production. The increased drainage provided by this method allowed for a radical increase in production in a very high rainfall area. At the same time as this method was introduced with a system of crop rotation to extend the cropping period in that garden site. This involved the use of legumes including peanuts, soybeans and indigenous forest species. At the same time as the sweet potato is harvested, the crop refuse is left to dry on the top of the mounds. It is occasionally turned if needed during wet weather. The trenches are then cleaned of fallen soil and other organic matter. This is deposited on the top of the raised beds in a type of green manuring system. The bed is then planted to a legume crop before being rotated back to sweet potato or an intermediate crop such as corn, aibika or upland rice. This method has proved very successful and has been widely adopted in the Avaipa district. Some garden sites have now been cropped continuously under this system for 15 years. Others still occasionally revert to a short bush fallow, but the raised beds remain in the fallow and can soon be re cultivated. This first successful innovation then led to further developments to improve the food production system to promote food security and self-reliance. « top |
|
|||||
|
© 2003 TerraCircle Association Inc ABN 61 142 713 518 |
Page updated